HOME HELP FEEDBACK HOW TO CITE ABSTRACTS ARCHIVE CME INFORMATION SEARCH Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):

This Article Services Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, J. Articles by Kim, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lee, J. Articles by Kim, J.

Cell, Molecular, and Tumor Biology: Other Cell, Molecular, and Tumor Biology Studies

The human oct-4 isoforms differ in their ability to confer self-renewal.

University of Sogang, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Abstract

B139

Oct-4 transcription factors play an important role in maintaining the pluripotent state of embryonic stem cells and may prevent expression of genes activated during differentiation. Human Oct-4 isoform mRNAs encode proteins that have identical POU DNA binding domains and C-terminal domains, but differ in their amino-terminal domains. We report here the cloning and characterization of the human Oct-4B isoform. Human Oct-4B cDNA encodes a 265-amino acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 30 kDa. ES cell-based complementation assays using ZHBTc4 ES cells showed that unlike human Oct-4A, Oct-4B cannot sustain ES cell self-renewal. In addition, Oct-4B does not bind to a probe carrying the Oct-4 consensus binding sequence and we demonstrate that two separate regions of its amino terminal domain are responsible for inhibiting DNA binding. We also demonstrate that Oct-4B is mainly localized to the cytoplasm. Overexpression of Oct-4B did not activate transcription from Oct-4-dependent promoters, whereas Oct-4A did as previously reported. Furthermore, transcriptional activation by human Oct-4A was not inhibited by co-expression of Oct-4B. Taken together, these data suggest that the DNA binding, transactivation, and abilities to confer self-renewal of the human Oct-4 isoforms differ.