AACR Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK HOW TO CITE ABSTRACTS ARCHIVE CME INFORMATION SEARCH
Cancer ResearchClinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionMolecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer ResearchCancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals PortalCancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education BookMeeting Abstracts Online
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]




This Article
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plona, T.
Right arrow Articles by Munroe, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Plona, T.
Right arrow Articles by Munroe, D.
[First AACR International Conference on Molecular Diagnostics in Cancer Therapeutic Development, Sep 12-15, 2006]


Diagnostic Technologies and Molecular and Cellular Profiling: Novel Assay Technologies

Novel mutation detection method for tumor samples grossly contaminated with normal tissue

Teri Plona, Kris Pike, Anne Book, Claudia Stewart, Shirley Tsang, Zhonghe Sun, Ester Rozenblum and David Munroe

SAIC-Frederick, Frederick, MD

Abstract

A109

For diagnostic purposes, mutation detection in cancer is difficult due to the presence of contaminating normal tissue infiltrated throughout the tumor tissue. Traditional PCR and sequencing methods are labor intensive and time consuming. Therefore, we have developed an assay using a nanochip array platform to find specific mutations in cancer-related genes. An amplicon-down method was applied. That is, the DNA sample was amplified with a biotin labeled primer and the resulting target amplicon was electronically addressed to a streptavidin membrane. This method is based on differences in melting temperatures. The data is collected either at a specific Tm, or during a series of temperature increments to create a melting curve. As proof of principle, we screened codon 12 of the K-ras gene, which is commonly mutated in several tumor types. The analysis was done on formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples that showed various degrees of contaminating normal tissue. We screened 233 patient samples corresponding to various cancer types. These included colon, rectum, pancreas, lymph node, lung, spleen, liver, stomach, and thyroid cancers. We were able to detect mutations in samples that contained as little as 20% tumor cells. In addition, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was nearly 100%. These data agreed 100% with PCR enrichment and sequencing results that were performed in parallel. Moreover, the method presented here was even more sensitive in some instances. For example, we were able to detect very low amounts of mutant allele that was not detected by traditional sequencing due to background noise. In conclusion, we found this test to be extremely accurate, reproducible, fast, and due to its versatility, generally applicable to any mutation screening. Furthermore, in a therapeutic setting, it could provide an effective selection criterion for a patient treatment regimen.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK HOW TO CITE ABSTRACTS ARCHIVE CME INFORMATION SEARCH
Cancer ResearchClinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionMolecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer ResearchCancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals PortalCancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education BookMeeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.